I'll echo Peter that if it is something that is optional versus
mandatory, then that sounds great.. I assume your implementation looks
somewhat like the existing container adapters?
Eric
On May 18, 2005, at 9:24 AM, Peter Courcoux wrote:
Hi Siegfried,
If this is done, which I believe is the case, as a service which can
be enabled/disabled from TurbineResources.properties then I would say
go ahead and commit to CVS HEAD.
Regards,
Peter
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi folks,
I integrated YAAFI into Turbine and the JUNIT test pass with YAAFI
and ECM. Shall I commit the changes to CVS HEAD or work on a branch?!
I lean towards committing to CVS HEAD since I also need to delete the
remaining Merlin artifacts from the CVS repo.
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
