Hi Eric,
I'm just stating the obvious ...
1) deprecated stuff should stay around for at least one release - no
matter how little time is between two releases ... :-)
2) were there any commits regarding the deprecated Turbine services not
being reflected in the Fulcrum services?
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Eric Pugh wrote:
Hi all,
In an attempt to chip away at the circular dependency between T2.4 and
Fulcrum Intake, I took the plunge of change T2.4 to use the Fulcrum
Factory and Pool services. I am ready to commit that patch. I've
attached a diff for review.
However, as I have gone through fixing everything, I have found that
MOST of the Turbine codebase is deprecated in favor of the Fulcrum
equivalents. Is there any really good reason to keep them in the
codebase, as the migration to Fulcrum is supposed to REMOVE those
things, not duplicate every service twice!
I'd like to remove the deprecated code in a seperate commit.
Comments?
Eric
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
