There are other singletons throughout the system, but they will play well with different caches I think. There may be some problems though.
The RemoteCacheManager returns instances based on location so there is only one connection per jvm. I'm not sure how much it will like having multiple caches with the same region name though. This may be too big of a change. > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Smuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:35 AM > To: Turbine JCS Developers List > Subject: RE: cache hub > > There can be one unconfigured I guess and other that match the name of the > file. > > If you call configure it will return the defualt. > > If you pass in a configuration file name to configure, it will give you > the > preconfigured instance that matches that name. > > Aaron > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:17 AM > > To: Turbine JCS Developers List > > Subject: Re: cache hub > > > > I like the idea of being able to have more than one. We can still > > provide a service or component interface that allows singletonesque > > access. > > > > On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 11:05, Aaron Smuts wrote: > > > > > > Early on someone complained about how you could one have one instance > of > > the > > > hub. I'm starting to think that is it a bad idea. > > > > > > It seems like you should be able to have as many instances as > > configuration > > > files. This could cause problems though. > > > > > > I'm not sure. > > > > > > One reason is that it isn't possible to create unit tests for the > > lateral > > > auxiliary otherwise. > > > > > > I need two instances of the same region with differently configured > > lateral > > > caches. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-jcs-dev- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-jcs-dev- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
