http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-dev%40jakarta.apache.org/msg02555.ht ml
Here's something I wrote on the commons LRUMap over two years ago. Are things better? > The memory leak in memory cache happens when the linked list becomes > inconsistent with the map. EHCache tests to expose this suggest the > problem > is with removeAll, but I've seen it with just get/put/remove. The LRU > memory > store implementation from EHCache uses an java.util.LinkedHashMap, or if > it's not available, a org.apache.commons.collections.map.LRUMap, thereby > dramatically reducing the complexity of the code, and eliminating > opportunities for the linked list and map to get out of sync. mands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
