You are right that the javagroups implementation in auxiliary builds is more configurable.
I'd like to move it into the main tree after a bit more evaluation. It is extremely useful. I'll kill the old one soon. Cheers, Aaron > -----Original Message----- > From: James Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 6:18 AM > To: Turbine JCS Developers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine- > jcs/src/java/org/apache/jcs/auxiliary/lateral/javagroups/behavior > ILateralCacheJGListener.java ILateralCacheJGAttributes.java > IJGConstants.java > > > Adding javagroups back to the main source tree after lots of > > testing. It is the only useful solution for distribution across > > multiple vms on the same machine. it is also useful when you don't > > know how many instances of you applicaiton might be created. > > I really think the approach under auxilliary-builds/javagroups is a > better solution. Much simpler, more configurable, and takes advantage > of javagroups more. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
