I proposed copy & pasting the current do-test to something like do-test-dontfail, without the if="" and an added, very abvious message that tests have failed (for people who by "accident" use the wrong test Also copying the test target to test-dontfail so it calls the new do test was in my plan.
I don't know what the reactor is about, so if you prefer that solution, you have to give me some hints ;) Mvgr, Martin On Fri, 2002-06-14 at 03:57, Brekke, Jeff wrote: > > Say I run the following: > > > > ant maven:dist-build maven:site > > > > The site will never be generated as the build fails if any of the > > unit tests do not pass. > > > > I agree with you when you say that a property tends to be forgotten > > and that a different target would be a better solution. > > > > -John K > > Doh! I see now, _your_ making site dependent on dist-build. I understand > how having the target generate the reports for the failed unit tests, but > not stop the ant build in this situation. I'm +0 then for a change to allow > this too ocurr, Martin seemed to have some ideas on non-failing targets, > maybe we can setup something that is only used in the Reactor for Continous > Integration so it won't be abused. Or maybe I'm just being too paranoid > about the users not watching the test output. > > ================================================================= > Jeffrey D. Brekke Quad/Graphics > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.qg.com > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
