Peter Lynch wrote:
> Your Centipede sounds like a fun project to work on.

Maven is fun too  :-)

> I forgot by now the point you are trying to make. While there are differences in
> how Maven and Centipede do things, in the end we strive for the same goal I
> guess. Make the end user happier and more productive. We have each made our
> choices. Trying two different approaches will help weed out the bad design.

I thought that collaboration from the beginning would have helper the 
goal better, but now I know that competition is a sort of collaboration 
between non-collaborative parties ;-)

> You are good at pointing out differences in implementation, but I have not heard
> anything concrete that one product can do and the other can't.

Because conceptually there isn't.

> Before writing one or the other off, I'll wait a while and see what the end user
> has to say.
> 
> In a year, lets compare Maven and Centipede and have this conversation again. It
> would be interesting.

:-)

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to