On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 12:31, robert burrell donkin wrote: > On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 03:12 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 10:07, Vincent Massol wrote: > > > >> Yes, you're right, it does it by default. In my experience XML parsing > >> is very fast (whatever parser you choose, a few ms for 100Ko files or > >> more), so I don't see XML parsing as a bottleneck. > > > > I could get piccolo to work for building but I couldn't get it to work > > with the tests but it seemed to be faster. We'll see. > > > >> But as you say, OptimizeIt will tell in the end ... > > i have an idea that you'll find that the bottleneck is the xml processing > (by betwixt) rather than the parsing. betwixt uses some code in digester > that is know to be slow but can be made to run much faster (costin > spotting this). > > optimization will be the next priority for digester once the current > release(s) are out the door.
Cool, I also have taken the easy way out doing value interpolation which could also be heavily improved. I think by the time 1.0 hits the pavement we should have an acceptable level of performance. Especially if we get a console working where you only need to parse the project.xml files when they have been changed. > - robert > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
