On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 16:08, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi Leif,
> 
> It is possible! Here is the solution:
> 
>     <dependency>
>       <id>bc4j:bc4jmt</id>
>       <version>9.0.2.7.94</version>
>     </dependency>
> 
> [...]
> 
> Then you can put all bc4j jars in MAVE_REPO/bc4j/jars

Leif,

You can use either the '+' or the ':" depending on how you rename the
JARs. Just take a peek at the naming conventions doc and you can choose
whatever suits you.
 
> Cheers,
> -Vincent
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Leif Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 21 August 2002 21:03
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: B6 Repository layout question
> > 
> > I'm currently setting up a project to use Maven B6, and was wondering
> if
> > what I'm doing is correct.  It doesn't seem right for this
> situation...
> > 
> > My application requires the Oracle BC4J .jar files in it's
> dependencies
> > list.  BC4J consists of approximately 10 jar files named like this:
> > bc4jmt.jar
> > bc4jctejb.jar
> > bc4jdomorcl.jar
> > bc4jhtml.jar
> > bc4jimdomains.jar
> > bc4jct.jar
> > ( there are more variations...)
> > 
> > In B4, I renamed all the bc4jxx.jar files to bc4jxx-9.0.2.7.94.jar (to
> > match the version of BC4J that I obtained the jars from) and placed
> them
> > all in repository root directory.
> > 
> > In B6, now that the repository layout has changed, is it true that the
> > ONLY
> > way to organize this stuff is to create a separate directory for EACH
> jar
> > file (as far as I can tell...):
> > bc4jmt/jars/bc4jmt-9.0.2.7.94.jar
> > bc4jctejb/jars/bc4jctejb-9.0.2.7.94.jar
> > etc...
> > 
> > Or, is it possible to include all of these jars in a single directory
> > like:
> > bc4j/jars/bc4jmt-9.0.2.7.94.jar
> > bc4j/jars/bc4jctejb-9.0.2.7.94.jar
> > etc..
> > 
> > It would sure be nice if the dependency tag allowed for this somehow
> to
> > "package up" jars that are really required to be used together..  The
> > reason they're split up into separate jar files, is so that you can
> use
> > separate pieces of functionality in different deployments, depending
> on
> > the
> > use cases.
> > 
> > Something like this, possibly...
> > 
> > <dependency>
> >    <id>bc4jct</id>
> >    <version>9.0.2.7.94</version>
> >    <url>http://www.oracle.com</url>
> >    <group>bc4j</group>
> > </dependency>
> > 
> > Thanks for any info on the subject,
> > 
> > Leif Nelson
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org

In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
  
  -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to