Cool...see I just need to stay focused on the task at hand and it falls into place...;-)
I had surgery today, and haven't had a chance to get back to the xdoclet/maven work. Ara, have you been able to work with it? Any updates? Jim On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Ara Abrahamian wrote: > A todo plugin is already there in xdoclet. No need to write a new one. > You put @todo in code and a nice html is generated from it. IIRC Eric > Hatcher's Ant book demonstrates it quite nicely. It's compatible with > jdk 1.4's todo tag. > > Ara. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:34 PM > > To: Turbine Maven Users List > > Subject: Re: @task or @todo? That is the question. > > > > On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 16:10, Jim Birchfield wrote: > > > This could be easily handled by an xdoclet plugin. A configurable > > > template could be dropped in as a goal with configurable tags to > look > > for > > > for reporting purposes.. > > > > I would have no problem with this. I like playing with the java > parser, > > as does Pete, but I'm not going to have much time for this. So if we > > used xdoclet I would move the java parser out of the core and put it > in > > a plugin and play with it there when I can. > > > > I'm all for xdoclet. > > > > > Jim > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > We've been using Maven for about a month now and think it's fab. > It's > > > > great to see the project really taking off, and that you're using > JIRA > > too! > > > > > > > > I'd like to draw the group's attention to the @task javadoc > comment > > for > > > > generating the task-list. This is a great feature, but we're > > concerned > > > > that there is a lot of momentum behind using @todo instead. > Eclipse > > will > > > > be using the @todo tag to generate its task list, and the tag has > been > > > > reserved by Sun for this purpose: > > > > > > > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/javadoc/proposed-tags.html > > > > > > > > So, would it make sense to switch to searching for the @todo tag > > instead, > > > > or perhaps make this a configurable project property? It would be > > great to > > > > have the flexibility to change this. > > > > > > > > As a secondary thought, could the plug-in search code comments for > > things > > > > like "TO-DO" a la Checkstyle? > > > > > > > > What do people think? > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-maven-user- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-maven-user- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-maven-user- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-maven-user- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > > jvz. > > > > Jason van Zyl > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-maven-user- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:turbine-maven-user- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
