Grace Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/10/2002 03:13:30 AM:

> If war is a part of j2ee, a war file is a middle result of j2ee goals, 
such
> as j2ee:ear, so does ejb? 
> 
> What's the solution to use ejb goals in b5 or higher version? It seems 
ant's
> ejbjar doesn't work too. I asked this question in an earlier email.

Quoting myself:
> The War plugin definitely works. The ejb piece of the
> j2ee plugin has not yet been correctly converted since
> b5.

The ejb tasks in the j2ee plugin currently are untested and I personally 
would be stunned if they worked. For all intents and purposes, they are 
not working. Ant's ejbjar doesn't work? Got any details?

> Thanks.
> 
> GL
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mr Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:16 PM
> To: Turbine Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: what's difference of war plugin and war in j2ee
> 
> 
> The war plugin used to be part of the j2ee plugin.
> 
> It was extracted to be standalone.
> 
> The j2ee docs are a little out of date, but getting
> better.
> 
> --- Grace Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From j2ee doc page, j2ee has some properties related
> > to war, such as
> > maven.j2ee.war.name, maven.j2ee.war.src, etc. I 'm a
> > little confused wether
> > j2ee calls war plugin or it has war itself. But from
> > plugin.jelly of j2ee I
> > didn't see any war goal or ejb goal. I need ejb
> > also. Or the war and ejb
> > cannot be called in maven.xml explicitly? thanks.
> 
> There is an example webapp project as part of the
> examples plugin. See your
> ${maven.home}/plugins/maven-examples-plugin-1.0-SNAPSHOT
> directory
> 
> The War plugin definitely works. The ejb piece of the
> j2ee plugin has not yet been correctly converted since
> b5.
> 
> 
> HTH,
> > 
> > GL
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to