Hi Ciaran,
I never tried that but ...:-)
You can also rename the stuff to e.g. mssql-mssqlserver-1.0b, mssql-
msbase and so on and
<dependency>
<id>mssql+mssqlserver</id>
<version>1.0b</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<id>mssql+msbase</id>
<version>1.0b</version>
</dependency>
The "+" is a sort of undocumented feature use for ant-optional and
similar stuff.
Siegfried Goeschl
CTO
=================================
IT20one GmbH
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.it20one.at
On 11 Dec 2002 at 12:24, Ciaran Treanor wrote:
> Hi,
> I've got a JDBC driver (MS) that is comprised of three jar files. Is
> it legal to have a dependency that looks like:
>
> <dependency>
> <id>mssqlserver</id>
> <version/>
> <jar>msbase.jar</jar>
> <jar>mssqlserver.jar</jar>
> <jar>msutil.jar</jar>
> </dependency>
>
> If not, should I resort to manually creating a single jar file from
> the contents of the three and referencing that single file or is there
> a more elegant way?
>
> Thanks,
> ct
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For
> additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
