From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi, > > I was just wondering what thoughts there are on how the content of > maven.xml could be included in the generated ant scripts, or whether > this is a good goal to obtain. > > The reason I ask is that it appears ant is faster to execute (and always > likely to be) because of a lower overhead - correct me if others > experience it differently. > > I'd like to use maven for all of our full builds and whenever there are > property changes, but ant whenever I change only a java file, or a jsp > file.
Though using the interactive console in Maven will probably be faster than Ant at peforming things like compiles etc. James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > This means you could generate the ant script by "executing" the > jelly script and writing out what would have been run in ant I think. > Even then, the definition will be fuzzy because some properties will be > used in jelly, and some only filtered, so sometimes you'd need to run > ant and sometimes maven. Anything that relied on a plugin (eg XJC now) > would also require maven. > > I'd just like to know what the thoughts are on this in the interest of > speeding up the build process for smaller tasks (although console/wizard > are also good alternatives), as well as utilising existing ant > frameworks/IDE plugins. At the moment, most of my stuff I've mavenised > won't completely build in ant because of necessary preGoals or postGoals. > > Thanks, > Brett > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
