On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 18:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2003 12:56:15 AM: > > > Hi, > > > > Just a FYI for those trying to use some of the new Jelly tag libs that > > have been separated. > > > > I'm sure a couple of you have run into the problem where you can't use > > the separated Jelly tag libs from within your maven.xml files. > > > > This is due to a design flaw on my part where the dependencies for a > > project are not made available to the classloader that runs the > > maven.xml Jelly script. This wasn't a problem before because all the tag > > libs were in the Jelly JAR which was loaded by forehead. We definitely > > want to support the Jelly break down that is happening so I hope to flip > > Maven over to using Classworlds (http://classworlds.werken.com) and > > allow access to any arbitrary tag libs. > > > > So the plan is if you plan to use any Jelly tag libs you will declare > > them in your project.xml file. I'm going to make the dependencies > > available to the maven.xml when it runs. > > Jason, I did this last week.... project dependencies are currently > processed for classpath entries.
Ah. I might nip and tuck this a bit and it will certainly change when classworlds goes in. > I've been successfully using this in the taglib split up. > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
