What if a new version is made available though? I think licences normally have to be accepted for each version. At least, that's how applications seem to work.
Hen On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Ben Walding wrote: > I'd expect that you only agree to a licence once ever for a product and > then that agreement is stored in a property file somewhere very high up > - eg. your home directory > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > >On 5 Feb 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > > > > > >>On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:34, John Casey wrote: > >> > >> > >>>What do you think the specs for the click-through license viewer should > >>>be? > >>> > >>> > >>I was hoping we could just copy what Netbeans has. The premise being > >>that it's a Sun product and they don't want to violate their own license > >>:-) I was hoping the click through license thingy would work but I'm not > >>certain it's legal yet. Sun could very well be violating their own > >>license, they are obviously exempt but we aren't. > >> > >>Was thinking a little popup could be fired off, maybe using the > >>interaction tag. Totally open to suggestions. Not something I'm looking > >>forward to doing. > >> > >> > > > >I'd have thought something very similar to the way you agree to a licence > >when installing the JDK from Sun as a script. With a flag to Maven which > >over-rides the licence-agreement bit? [for person-less builds?] > > > >Hen > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
