On 07 Jun 2001 17:44:01 -0700, Jon Stevens wrote:
[cropped]
>
> Lastly, for the each negative that someone fabricates about Velocity, I can
> point out at least 10 negatives that JSP has. Why would anyone in their
> right mind use a technology with so many fundamentally broken aspects to it?
>
> You make the decision. �
In the most pure spirit of knowledge sharing, and in order to make the
most informed possible decision, I would like to know what the senior
designers and developers of the Turbine framework have as an opinion of
the Barracuda/Enhydra combination <http://barracuda.enhydra.org/>,
<http://enhydra.enhydra.org/>.
I used to work with Enhydra, having developed with it several sucessful
projects before Turbine came into my attention and seized it completely,
because of its powerful versatility, and because its easy to acomplish
integrability with other technologies and APIs (as a matter of an
example: I'm specially happy because of the seamless use I'm doing of
FOP within Turbine to generate PDF files for the client to print his/her
invoices).
Nonetheless, since the time I started to use Turbine, Lutris came out
with their first beta release of Barracuda, and since I'm yet in the
early stages of my first project with Turbine, I'm feeling just as a
fifteen years old girl about to make *the* decision of her life... :)
Please enlighten a little bit my (technological) way.
Best of regards.
--
"Create like a god, Bruno Unna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
command like a king, Internet de Alta Calidad
and work like a slave." Red Hat Certified Engineer
Kawasaki PGP public key available
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
