Rodney Schneider wrote:

From the API docs:
-----------
 When the ID_TABLE must be updated we must ensure that IDBroker
 objects running in different JVMs do not overwrite each other. This is
 accomplished  using  using  the transactional support occuring in some
 databases.  Using  this  class  with  a database that does not support
 transactions should be limited to a single JVM.
-----------

Eek! Couldn't the class be modified to use optimistic locking to avoid this limitation?

L.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Reply via email to