Bill wrote:
Henning

I think working on Freemarker support would be a waste of the developers
valuable time.

Bill,


I'm curious. Have you made some kind of point estimate on how long it would take developers to put back in the FM support?

Surely, it being a waste of time depends on how much time it actually is, doesn't it?


However, divorcing Turbine from Velocity to allow more
flexibility not only seems like a good idea, it seems absolutely
necessary if the I understand the path to Avalonization.

What is Avalonization?


Regards,

Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
FreeMarker-Velocity comparison page, http://freemarker.org/fmVsVel.html
FreeMarker 2.3pre4 is out!




-b




On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 06:41, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:

Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:

Hi,

is anyone of you needing or missing FreeMarker Support in Turbine 2.2?

I believe the question should maybe be rephrased:

Is any one of you needing or missing decimal number support in Velocity?

Ok,


Folks, is anyone of you missing <insert your feature here that FM
supports and Velocity does not> from the View portion of Turbine?

You will find a feature complete list on http://www.freemarker.org for
FreeMarker and on http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity for Velocity.

If yes, would you consider a switch from Velocity to FreeMarker as
View for Turbine or would you get a pull tool to support this feature?

The reason for this (and Jonathans' response): On the Velocity lists,
there has been some rumbling about the current development state of
Velocity and talking about alternatives to it. As we (Turbine) did
remove the (quite aged and not actively maintained) FreeMarker support
post Turbine-2.2, there have been some accusations of doing this
because of "political reasons". As I was not really involved in the FM
stuff or its removal, I'm trying to collect opinions from the Turbine
users about getting FM support back into Turbine. However, if noone
wants to use it, it wouldn't make much sense and the change itself is
(IMHO) quite a major one to support FM really good.

Jonathan, some technical information (which you as a non-Turbine guy
might not have seen yet): Unfortunately the o.a.velocity.Context is
buried pretty deep in the Turbine code (this is legacy of the original
turbine developers). So we will have to replace this in every place
with an Adapter class with plugs either onto the Velocity Context or a
similar class in every other view solution (FreeMarker, WebMacro
etc.).


Doing so, it would be necessary for all of our users to change the
imports in their self-written classes (Action, Screen), because the
Context is part of the signature of the methods which are overloaded
by user classes.

If we don't do this but just 'bolt FM support on' by using different
classes, there wouldn't be much won, because people would still use
VelocityScreen, VelocityPage etc. just as in all the example code
around and the FM code would start to rot (again). I don't want this,
because it wouldn't buy much for the Turbine users.
So we would need some major core changes to allow developers to simply
switch views without having to rewrite all of their classes later.

If we want to have engine-independent view support which is equal for
all templating solutions (and not heavily Velocity based as the
current view is, which is one of the reasons why noone really uses FM
and/or WebMacro with Turbine and the code started to rot), we will
have to make this (major) change. This is something that affects all
of our users and we will listen to them.


Is anybody missing any of those features?

Please send opinions to this list. Turbine 2.3 is pretty much in feature-freeze state and I want to put out an RC until the end of next week (Colin, don't worry, your Intake changes will be in :-) ) and I'm already starting to collect ideas for 2.4-dev. However, moving to the pipeline and towards Avalon will (for me) stay top priority.

        Regards
                Henning



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to