Quinton,

I only see the session id on the page following my login page and only
for the very first session that is created for the context. I have
never seen the session id added to the urls that are generated for
images - but then I am using the turbine 2.2 uri code.


I had a view in the past that this was somehow a container issue (i.e.
tomcat or whatever you are using).  This was based on my observation
that the session id was not displayed in this manner when I was using
jetty (while I do observe this behaviour using tomcat-4.1.24, having
a bit of a play with this right now I can't seem to reproduce the
behaviour locally, only from my remote server).

So without offering anything concrete in the way of help, I think my
observations may support your conjecture - i.e. that the new uri code
is getting the session id as part of the base uri for the site when
the container is providing it.

Cheers,

Scott

Quinton McCombs wrote:

The problem has just become a bit more strange.

On the first visit to the application, it is common to see the
;jsessionid=xcxxxx stuff.


On my test server I started noticing that the images were not loading on
the login screen.  When I looked at the source for the page, I
discovered that the URL for the image had ;jsessionid=xxxxx appended to
it.  Curiously, this does not present a problem on a Windows platform.
On Unix, the image is not returned to the browser.

My production server is running a slightly older version of Turbine and
uses the older ContentURI tool.  It does not generate the image URLs
with the ;jsessionid=xxx at the end even on the first visit to the app.

Now... About getting more stange.  In an attempt to try and track down
the problem, I started stepping through the code with my debugger.  I
made sure to clear my cookies and cached web pages from the browser.  I
also restarted Turbine.  As I stepped through the code, I did not see
the URLs being returned from ContentTool.getURI having the
;jsessionid=xxx at the end.  I go back and look at the source for the
generated page and the URLs have been generated correctly.

It appears, that I intimidated the code by pulling out the debugger.
Everything works correctly now.  I wonder though....  Perhaps, it will
get brave again in the future and decide to start generating URLs
incorrectly again....   ;-)

--------------------------------------------
Quinton McCombs
NequalsOne - HealthCare marketing tools
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.NequalsOne.com




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 3:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Possible problem with the new URI code



Do you need the jsessionid stuff? Or is it attempting to go to a login page since you don't have it, which would cause I guess extra records in your web logs?


Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Quinton McCombs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Possible problem with the new URI code


I have noticed a strange problem that I think might be related to the new URI code. When using ContentTool to generate a URI for images, stylesheets, etc, I not get the ;jsessionid=xxxxxx appended to the end of the URL. This is causing my images not to load. Of course, hitting refresh on the browser fixes this problem.


Any ideas?

--------------------------------------------
Quinton McCombs
NequalsOne - HealthCare marketing tools mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.NequalsOne.com





--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: 0403 278 908




--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to