"David Wynter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>OK,
>The 2 changes that I would make are simple. 1, use 'co' instead of 'export'
>when getting any of the sources out of CVS. 2, Make it more explict which
>project.xml is being edited.
Thanks. The difference between "co" and "export" is, that you don't
get CVS directories if you "export" the tree. If you use ancient
editors (like e.g. emacs as I do ;-) ), it won't try to access a
source repository if you make changes in your local tree and
accidentially try to check it back in. But as "co" might be better known to
CVS users, this is fine with me, too.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
--- Quote of the week: "It is pointless to tell people anything when
you know that they won't process the message." --- Jonathan Revusky
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
