"David Wynter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi Henning,
>Just a point of clarification on the changes to extend TurbineUser in
>T2.3-dev below.
>Below you have your extension classes in the package
>"de.intermeta.myapp.security.om" and in a later email to the list you said I
>could not reference via foreign key the extended user table unless it was
>all in one *-schema.xml file. Does this mean you have all your application
>classes in the *.security.om package (!?) as well as the security specific
>ones?.
Hi,
well, this might be a Torque limitation. Actually I've never really
thought about this. The problem is, that Torque won't allow you to use
a <foreign-key> tag to reference a table that is not in the same
schema.xml file.
Maybe Martin can say something to this. I'm not exactly a Torque guru.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
--- Quote of the week: "It is pointless to tell people anything when
you know that they won't process the message." --- Jonathan Revusky
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
