Turbine runs so much better in Jetty, at least for me. This application is
still running on T2.2_01 code but no problems there.
I found Jetty to take less than a few minutes to setup and drop my Turbine
application into and start right up.
I wrote a jetty.sh script to help with starting and stopping which I have
posted here
http://kiasoft.com/~painter/jetty.sh
This was the only thing that I really had to complain with Jetty, but it
only took a few minutes to migrate my catalina.sh script to work well for
jetty.
Item to note: jetty does not support class reloading, however I have
found that starting and stopping Jetty during development actually seems
to take less time than waiting for Tomcat to reload all my classes.
I just issue a jetty.sh stop/start and am ready to test again.
Jeff Painter
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Eric Pugh wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> Would you be able to comment on using Jetty? I have been thinking about
> trying to do some comparisons of applications between Jetty and Tomcat..
> haven't seen anything too specifically authoriatative.. Where their any
> Turbine related hiccups?
>
> Eric
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
