#728: Investigate PEAK's [] syntax for decorators under 2.3
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: kevin | Owner: simon
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone: 0.9
Component: TurboGears | Version: 0.9a4
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
FYI, the 'dispatch.as()' decorator in RuleDispatch will apply no-argument
decorators, e.g.:
[dispatch.as(classmethod)]
So, it's certainly possible for you to make a decorator that takes
uncalled decorators, if you don't want to have to change them.
Indeed, you could create just one decorator called
"decorate(*decorators)", and you wouldn't have to change any of your
existing decorators' code at all.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.turbogears.org/turbogears/ticket/728>
TurboGears <http://www.turbogears.org/>
TurboGears front-to-back web development
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears Tickets" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-tickets
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
