#1483: Make TG support SA 0.4
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: paj | Owner: paj
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: high | Milestone: __unclassified__
Component: SQLAlchemy | Version: 1.0.3
Severity: normal | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment (by add):
by end users who would like to contribute and start to use docs to learn
cool stuff about their apps in the first place. Both annotations and
contributions will only clutter the interface by default as a design
pattern rather than trying to put it all together. That way you can never
create offline or print docs of high quality without again having the devs
or current admins maintain the comments and annotations. Hopefully a small
Wiki quality team will evolve (i am against ops or admins) to review and
summarize the contributions. I hope this gives us more users as
contributors than having the docs focused on the devs. Cheers, duns
[http://www.about-china.net.cn/wrought-iron/cat_4.html china tour] I still
prefer a wiki like approach since the php (or mysql) docs are very
cluttered when you have to take their comments in account. On the other
hand they are professionally maintained imho, since they are *much* better
than KDE documentation. KDE is by far larger and has so many different
apps, which need screenshots and end user not dev/api docs
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1483#comment:17>
TurboGears <http://www.turbogears.org/>
TurboGears front-to-back web development
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TurboGears Tickets" group.
This group is read-only. No posting by normal members allowed.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-tickets?hl=en?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
