#66: Need SQLObject session storage driver in CP
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: GreanTea | Owner: anonymous
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: high | Milestone: __future__
Component: TurboGears | Version: 0.9a6
Severity: normal | Resolution: wontfix
Keywords: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by jorge.vargas):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
Replying to [comment:4 Chris Arndt]:
> It doesn't look like a SO-based session storage is going to happen. The
question is whether we want to build one based on SQLAlchemy instead now,
or do we want to implement a session handling based on the visit
framework, or can we utilize a wsgi session handler in TG 1.5 / CP3?
I agree with this, no one is interested in a SO based session storage, if
we are going to work on a SA one it should be a separate ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/66#comment:5>
TurboGears <http://www.turbogears.org/>
TurboGears front-to-back web development
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TurboGears Tickets" group.
This group is read-only. No posting by normal members allowed.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-tickets?hl=en?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
