Jorge Godoy wrote: > > Hmmmm... I always believed that the Schema had priority over the widget > validator.
Yep, the upper level Schema has priority over everything, your example will work but is incoherent since you defined is_required = False and not_empty = True. :D Not that someone will actually do it anyway... > > Indeed, I was misunderstanding and I saw that with other posts. :-) (Also, > sorry for the lot os posts, I'm not at "home", so there are some network > problems here and one of them hold all of my messages and duplicated some of > them...) > No Problem > > I don't remember if it worked for me... You even said that it had problems > with the "not_empty" syntax... :-( But I checked it and I don't see the > "requiredfield" class anymore... (But it is there in my CSS, so I might have > it somewhere... hehehehe. I'll check it for you later and I'll tell you if > it works and where.) > I'm seeing it everywhere (ok, where it belongs), anyway I'm relying on not_empty (that doesn't work right without my patched FE) but on a simulated validation. ;-) Ciao Michele --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
