On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Ken Kuhlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Florent Aide schrieb:
>>> Ken,
>>>
>>> could you branch from the 1.1 HEAD ? I'd really like to see _this_ new
>>> branch become 1.5 :) I will be switching to it for my projects based
>>> on 1.1 to test and patch...
>>>
>>> I am sure some other people out there will love those changes too and
>>> we'll have a stabilized version quite soon. This (and all the other
>>> nice changes in 1.1 HEAD) will make for a nice 1.5 release.
>
> Florent.. I agree that having 1.5 based on CP3 would be sweet.. but
> there's one thing I should have made explicit:  I had to yank the
> deprecated features of testutil in order to get this to work.   So
> this change needs to be done in two releases:  one to get the new
> testing approach in place, and another to drop create_request, etc.
> and move to CP3.1.
>
> I saw that you updated 1.1 branch's release.py to version 1.5, so I'm
> assuming you're no longer planning on a 1.1 release.   Is there any
> chance you might change your mind? (Or perhaps I'm assuming
> incorrectly?)  Do you still want me to create this branch as 1.5?
>

Done.  The remaining issues (that I know about) are documented in the
changelog.  I'm going to leave #1181 open until these items are
addressed.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to