On Saturday November 22, 2008 20:50:02 Jorge Vargas wrote: > This is what confused me, why will you want to have auth, using > require. if you have a "public page" the only advantage I can see will > be if we had the default "anonymous" user with it's permissions on > place and it will serve as some kind of "visit" in TG1, but as far as > I understand that isn't in trunk yet.
Right, not yet. > Bottom line is that I see both as needed, you have Controller and > SecureController, the first one is for public page the last one for > private pages, it will be weird to have to say something like "for > this controller you are required to be anonymous" What about a controller that is made up of the registration, password recovery and login pages? You definitely want the user to be anonymous. Cheers. -- Gustavo Narea <http://gustavonarea.net/>. Get rid of unethical constraints! Get freedomware: http://www.getgnulinux.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
