On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Christoph Zwerschke <c...@online.de> wrote: > Am 12.12.2011 00:20, schrieb Alessandro Molina: > >> Now pylons-less branch passes all the tests both with and without >> pylons installed and is now a bit faster than the pylons based branch. > > > Congratulations! This is really a big step forward. > > Did you run some real-life TG apps with that branch? Unfortunately, our test > suite is not very comprehensive, so we should test this with some of our > apps and add more unit tests if we notice any problems. Hope I can find some > time over the holidays for giving this a try. >
Not really, I have a fake app I use to develop that practically ended up being a test suite as it uses every single tgext that I wrote and they seem to work. But it doesn't test for example session, i18n and configuration. Yes, I still don't know if it cares about the config options, the config object was quite pervert (wrapper of a wrapper of a DispatchingConfig used as a StackedProxy) and I'm afraid that I might have broke something. I'll be really glad to anyone that has a few hours to invest testing the pylons-less branch on any applications that he has available. Just keep in mind that it is based on TG2.1.4 so the application itself has to be compatible with TG2.1.4 Even pylons based controllers should work, just check that tg.pylons_compatible is True. Disabling it makes the app go faster at the price of not being compatible with Pylons related Controllers (XMLRPCController for example) My current target for the branch is to achieve 100% code coverage on the TG module. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to turbogears-trunk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
