The only part that concerns me is the different tests loading, apart for that it might be fine. As nose1 supports py3 anyway and nose2 is still less widespread should we postpone this to a 2.3.X release?
Maybe we can migrate the tests of the quickstarted app to nose2 as we need to rewrite it anyway while keeping TG itself on nose1 for a while more. Bests, Alessandro On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]>wrote: > Since TG 2.3 requires Py 2.6 already, this would be a good opportunity to > move from nose to nose2. What do you think? > > -- Christoph > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TurboGears Trunk" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to > turbogears-trunk+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<turbogears-trunk%[email protected]> > . > To post to this group, send email to > turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.**com<[email protected]> > . > Visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/**group/turbogears-trunk<http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk> > . > For more options, visit > https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out> > . > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
