I don't mean to be fresh, but why use an ORM at all? I'm finding that
the learning curve for SQLObject is a bit steep. And then, when I
really need to do something, which will nearly always involve joining
multiple tables, I have to write a bunch of gibberish that really looks
alot like SQL joins.

Sure, if I was in javaland, then I would be using hibernate and HQL to
abstract away the db layer so that I could swap db implementations with
just a config file change. But I'm not at all sure that you get that
with SQLObject.

So, if anyone cares to, please. Educate me as to why this is nec in the
first place...

As a related issue, any project of any size is going to want to
abstract the database away and present a facade that will in turn talk
to the db. The facade (or db wrapper, whatever) could use an ORM, or be
jython talking to java + hibernate/jdbc, or use DB-API...etc.

Meanwhile, I'm thinking of just using DB-API within TG to see if that
is simpler or more confusing...

-Todd

Reply via email to