Sean Cazzell wrote:
Great, I saw your post on CP-dev. I wonder if Ian would consider transitioning SQLObject? I know he mentioned earlier that all of his new code (in other projects) is using names_with_underscores.
I'm not sure how feasible it really is. It's an annoying transition to make, as it breaks everything, but only *barely* breaks everything. SQLObject generally provides good backward compatibility. Also, there's quite a bit of indirect documentation out there, little of which is likely to be updated.
I am changing some names as I reimplement things (like the new joins are ManyToMany and OneToMany), and new functions added will probably be underscore separated (and it's not uncommon that functions and methods have different styles). But I'm not sure if I can change the naming convention.
-- Ian Bicking / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://blog.ianbicking.org
