Kevin Dangoor wrote: > On 11/12/05, william <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think that the most important point is that the pages can be updated > > by every TG contributors. That's the basic idea of a wiki. Isn't it ? > > > > How many Trac users expect to have a RST file ? > > Does Kevin prefer strandard Trac or RST ? > > The Trac syntax has the advantage that there's help for it a click > away when you're editing. RST is much heavier syntax, but is certainly > more capable and many people know it. > > I'd say that my inclination would be to use whatever is easiest for > editing and contributions. The wiki is, after all, a "documentation > playground"... any longer-lasting docs need to go into the repository > and become part of the docs proper. > > Kevin
Yes, RST is difficult compared to Trac wiki syntax, anyway for maintaining a FAQ it's ideal. IMHO the only place where rst really needs to be used is in fact the FAQ, but this can make it difficult for other people to contribute. What about a short FaqSyntax page where we explain how to add a new FAQ and the syntax needed (links, headers... only a rst subset)? Or maybe we can have a temporary page where we can collect new FAQ that other (rst aware) people can then add to the main FAQ? Ciao Michele
