Jorge Godoy wrote: > Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > actually, the programming that you would do would be the same in all > > three instances. > > Three answer for the three different options... Couldn't it be made generic / > configurable? :-) >
Thus I give my 2 cents ;-). I prefer to use 1). But you should look at Quixote ExtDirectory: http://quixote.ca/qx/ExtDirectory This give full flexibility (like proposed by Jorge). Does this is implementable into CP2.1 ???? AFAIK, such flexible URL would available in CP2.2. William