David Stanek wrote:
On 12/19/05, *Steven Kryskalla* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
This seems like the best possible outcome for the two projects, but it
will need some momentum and approval from Kevin.
Why not just start creating patches and tickets? Anything that doesn't
fundamentally change TG would probably be easily accepted.
I think it's only fair for Subway developers to get a bit more
consideration and some more definitive decisions than just submitting
another set of patches in a tracker. The contributions are concrete and
be discussed in much more detail than mere API experimentations. They
represent ideas that have gone through several iterations already, and
while those ideas have been developed in a slightly different context,
it's only *slightly* different.
Also, if Subway is going to "close up shop" so to speak, that's
disheartening if its ideas live in some sort of limbo (out of which they
may or may not ever emerge) in the form of TG patches. It will be much
more pleasant if Subway's pieces can either be thrown out for good (in a
kind of cathartic cleaning) or merged into something else (TG or perhaps
new projects; for instance, Crack Ajax would be a good candidate for an
entirely new package).
--
Ian Bicking / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://blog.ianbicking.org
