Jorge Godoy wrote:
Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I would certainly welcome that. When Subway tried to use Paste I was still
trying to figure out how plugins should work, and it was pretty messy -- since
then I've been using eggs and entry points and everything stabalized quickly.
Paste interfaces have been stable for some time now.
I was looking at Paste's website... Where can I find more "Paste is good for
this and that and you can use it like this" docs?
Well, I've always had a problem explaining what it is. Maybe this more
recent blog entry is the best description of it at the moment:
http://blog.ianbicking.org/what-is-paste-yet-again.html
There's a couple more recent things in Paste; Clark Evans added some
identification/authentication code, and Ben Bangert just added some
rough OpenID code. Last night I just committed two new paster commands
for installing and setting up applications; they are rough but
more-or-less extractions of what I'm using at work. But it's mostly
what's listed there.
Actually using these bits in the context of TG is the open question. I
don't want Paste to be leaky abstraction (or rather, Paste shouldn't
leak into the abstractions a framework provides), but that means that it
relies on a framework to do some integration work (you can't really have
both).
--
Ian Bicking / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://blog.ianbicking.org
