On 12/27/05, Dan Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, explanation required: > The code compares the "value" attribute of the widget with the input > value. As the input value is None, and you have not specified the > attribute value, this is also None. Therefore the "checked" attribute > is inserted. The Bool validator returns True or False, neither of which > equal None and therefore the attribute "checked" is missing. Therefore > always set the "value" attribute to an explicit value. > > I know this is not clear or documented, and it would be better to have > a "value" argument in the constructor or somesuch.
with a reasonable default... it sounds like what Jeremy's trying to do is fairly standard. Kevin -- Kevin Dangoor Author of the Zesty News RSS newsreader email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] company: http://www.BlazingThings.com blog: http://www.BlueSkyOnMars.com
