On 29 Dec 2005 10:36:06 -0200, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Peter Herndon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have some previous experience with CherryPy 2.0 and Kid, from all of > > 8 months ago or so, though pre-dating TurboGears. I've got a website > > I need to build, and I'd like to know if I should use the current > > release, 0.9 from svn, or should I wait for the 0.9 release? The > > website is a side project, and I have no pressing need to start on it > > immediately, if the 0.9 release is coming shortly. > > What do you need? I find 0.9 so much better than 0.8 that I'd try it even in > SVN. Changing areas are mainly on widgets and identity, so the other parts > are very stable (the parts you'd have on 0.8... ;-)) > > -- > Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I work as a sysadmin for a major hospital, and I want to build a website that contains contact information for each server. That is, the 24x7 operations team will be able to log in (so auth is required), look up a server by name or IP, and get both full details on the server as well as all the contact information of the administrators who are responsible for the system. There are typically a primary, secondary and tertiary contact for each server. In addition, there are DBA contacts. And an administrative interface for adding, modifying and deleting servers and contacts would be necessary, so two separate levels of access will be required. I'm on the fence yet as to whether basic use needs to be authenticated, or if it can be open to all users on our intranet -- that will need a vote from the rest of the sysadmins, I suppose.
I'm looking at this as an opportunity to learn JavaScript for a second version of the application -- the first version just needs to be functional. What is "identity", in TurboGears context? It sounds interesting, from an authN/authZ perspective. Thanks, ----Peter
