Again, I don't usually get involved in arguments like this because I simply don't use the templates (my pages are static HTML with Ajax calls), but one of my initial complaints with Kid is that it *changes* my code.

If I write in XHTML, I expect it to *stay* XHTML not be translated into HTML 4.0. And if I specify XHTML in the config file, I expect it to look the way I wrote it, complete with closing script tags instead of autoclosed script tags (<script src=""></script> instead of <script src=""/>).

I *really* hate anything that changes my code, because chances are I know what I'm doing. And if I don't, I won't learn unless it breaks.

I won't use Kid until it quits screwing with my code.

On 28 Dec, 2005, at 10:18 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

for 2 I just say from the quick look I took at Cheetah went this thread

started, that most people complaining about kid are your lazy to try

it, because Cheetah seems easier at first, and I have exactly the same

complains to Chettah as you have for kid, so it's a matter of style.



-- 

Jeff Watkins

http://newburyportion.com/


Computers, they're just a fad.



Reply via email to