On 2/3/06, Michele Cella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kevin Dangoor wrote: > > Man, my notes on these changes were awful. > > > > As noted below, the widget is no longer in the namespace of the > > template. What I didn't mention is that I simplified a lot of the > > variable names. Since these templates are very special purpose and > > just for widgets, things like "widget_value" just became "value". At > > this point, using simpler names seemed to make sense, and it didn't > > seem to me that name collisions were going to be a giant problem. > > > > What name collisions are you refering to? I have not noticed them or > something strange going on. > > Tests are all running fine.
I was referring to the name collisions that don't exist :) If memory serves, I originally passed "widget_value" to the template instead of "value" because I didn't want to collide with variable names used by user-created widgets. Those are the name collisiions that i think are not much of an issue. Kevin
