On 2/21/06, Richard (koorb) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All honest comments are welcome. Take a look at it without CSS too, I > would very much appreciate critique on accessibility, usability, and > standards-compliance. (heres looking at you nerkles!)
What was wrong with the design everybody agreed on? Why did the site have to get web 2.0 bandwagon-ified? I've got plenty of issues with this design, but I'd like to get those out of the way first. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
