"BJörn Lindqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes it does, kind of. You are right that I'm expecting to much of > Widgets. For complicated views, it seems like it is much smarter to go > widgetless than to try and compose it using TurboGears Widgets.
What I'm doing is creating my own widgets when I see that I'll reuse the structure or that I need something that changes what widgets provide by just a little bit. This allows me to count with widget validation and having a "standard" API through my code. Of course, some specific and unique parts are done in both JavaScript and (X)HTML, but everyday there are less parts like these. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
