Sure. I'd hazard a guess that Scriptaculous is well developed enough to only get incremental improvements now.
I'm not sure what Thomas has planned for the Scriptaculous port but it might be an idea to fork it at some point and make it more Mochi-oriented. This is quite an important thing for marketing TurboGears - people are going to associate the cool things you can do with JavaScript/DHTML with the framework itself because these things are highly visible in screencasts/demos. MochiKit is a cracking AJAX library but by default/definition it doesn't address dynamic UI which is a serious omission for TurboGears if we want to show how cool apps can look on the client side. >On 3/6/06, Justin Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>I'd probably convert to MochiKit if it had something to equal >>Scriptaculous. I know that there's some kind of port of Scriptaculous >>but as always it's going to code drift as Scriptaculous gets bug >>fixes/more features. >> >> > >The person doing the port (Thomas Herve, I believe) has it most of the >way there and even integrated the latest diffs very quickly. Once the >initial work is done, following the diffs is not as hard. > >It's not fully complete, though. I was having some trouble with >Sortable when I was putting my presentation together, so I just used >Scriptaculous itself for that purpose. > >Kevin > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
