On 3/7/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the run up to PyCon, followed by PyCon itself, I've been a bit more > disconnected here than I would like. We're 7 days in to March and I'm > only #6 on the list of emailers this month!
Alberto and Michele would have quite a few more posts, but they have taken most of their bug discussion to trac, and a good chunk of the rest of us were at pycon, so not much work happening. > Concurrently with all of that, the groundwork was laid at PyCon for > the next major release of TurboGears (codename "First Class"). First > Class will simplify certain aspects of TurboGears code while greatly > improving the ability to reuse TurboGears apps and easy install > middleware for a variety of functions (eg. caching and exception > handling). First Class == .10 and I assume is from the work during the sprint? > First Class makes heavy use of WSGI and takes advantage of and builds > on TurboGears 0.9's config system. I'm hoping that there are some > others out there who'd like to work on this branch. I have a rough understanding of what's going on in the branch, but not a good one. I've got a few questions, some for me and some that I know others will ask: How does this affect the long term viability of 0.9 based apps? I know there is a lot of paste middleware that can be plugged in and am not sure how apps I write now will translate into a brave new wsgi world. Should the people waiting for TG to settle down wait out to the First Class release? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
