I've commented that I'm not entirely fond of the notion of splitting
the list into "-users" and "-devel". Earlier today, it struck me that
it *is* important to do so, however.
During 0.9's development, I thought it important that the things we
were working on were getting the attention of the community as a
whole. The downside to this, though, is that more people probably
moved to the svn trunk version than was wise and that people would
have seen the reports of things breaking and possibly gotten the wrong
impression of TurboGears 0.8's stabiity.
I'm imagining the kinds of conversations we're going to have about
First Class and I really don't want that to trip people up from all of
the great things we've built for the 0.9 release.
I don't think the split is so much a split between core development
and what most users are doing and asking about. I think the split is
more about people using current (0.8 and 0.9) releases and future
development (First Class, at present).
So, I propose making a new list called turbogears-future, specifically
chartered for discussions about the next (or even farther down the
line) major version of TurboGears. Bug fixes and minor features that
show up in the current releases will continue to appear on this list.
How does that strike you?
Kevin
--
Kevin Dangoor
Author of the Zesty News RSS newsreader
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
