On Mar 24, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Elver Loho wrote:
> > Your tinyurl doesn't work. ? try this: http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears/browse_frm/thread/ ed155b1e38bf717e > > As for what's missing, then that would be features mentioned around > 0.8, but not included therein, or features in 0.9, but not documented > very well. Your right about documentation. This is something PHP do quite well. Cheers Ronald > > > Elver > > On 3/24/06, Ronald Jaramillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi Elver, >> >> On Mar 24, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Elver Loho wrote: >> >>> >>> Any ideas on when all this magic will be available? >> >> Well, this is still on the draft board, the idea right now is to >> start fleshing thinks out and get people excited - some >> my even want to join the development ;) >>> >>> TurboGears is an awesome, refreshing break from PHP and it's got >>> a lot >>> of great ideas, but when I use 0.8 or 0.9, it feels like there's >>> stuff >>> missing. (Well, it's not 1.0, so that's to be expected.) >> >> Stuff like? Comparing to PHP? >> >>> >>> Anyhow, can anyone point me in the direction of making Catwalk in >>> 0.9 >>> accessible to everyone via password authentication? I'd like to >>> set up >>> a small website with several administrators. Catwalk works just fine >>> for the admin side on the current prototype and I don't see any >>> point >>> in duplicating its behaviour. That'd just be a case of "not invented >>> here" syndrome. >> >> Check this discussion: >> http://tinyurl.com/rems9 >> >> Cheers. >> Ronald >> >> >>> >>> >>> Elver >>> >>> On 3/24/06, Michele Cella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Kevin Dangoor wrote: >>>>> >>>>> DataController will either become more useful or be replaced... >>>>> >>>>> My thinking is that there'd still be a CatWalk in the Toolbox >>>>> that you >>>>> can run and do the same kinds of things with that you do today. >>>>> The >>>>> difference will be that you can do *exactly* the same things in >>>>> your >>>>> sites in a customizable way using FastData, because they'll >>>>> both be >>>>> using the same underlying code (whatever that code may be). >>>>> >>>>> Wow. That was a lot of hand waving. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, very cool Ronald. >>>> >>>> It seems as CatWalk2 will be the right time to figure out how to >>>> enache >>>> our widgets system so that you can nest a widget template into an >>>> existing DOM by using javascript, this will make for a great >>>> reusability things easier for you and for customizing in the >>>> FastData >>>> side. ;-) >>>> >>>> Ciao >>>> Michele >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> ________________________________ >> Ronald Jaramillo >> mail: ronald AT checkandshare DOT com >> blog: http://www.checkandshare.com/blog >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________ Ronald Jaramillo mail: ronald AT checkandshare DOT com blog: http://www.checkandshare.com/blog --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
