Well... it's certainly minimal :) But it's not really what I'm looking for -- if I make my own WSGI application and server combination, then TK is bound to work with it :) as it will likely make the same assumptions I did when writing the WSGI layer for TK. But it might not work with other people's real systems, that use different corners of the spec that I might've missed.
What I need is a simple, complete, conforming server & application into which I can drop TraceKnack and make sure TK doesn't break any of the existing functionality. There must be some around. If not, it's OK, I'll just wait for the WSGI-based TurboGears. Simon Belak wrote: > This is probably as minimal as it gets: > > http://pythonpaste.org/do-it-yourself-framework.html > > Cheers, > Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
