I'm going to reply to a couple things here, since your message is last and the last line sums things up pretty well.
- In response to Robin, I suggested templating css/pss with cheetah, but I don't really like that idea. CSS should be static, making them dynamic throws out much of their benefit. I'm still toying with templating CSS just so the overall width of a page and related layout could be tailored to a users preferences, but except fo that, I don't think I want CSS to change. - As for the cascading element of CSS, that Jorge points out, I think cascading is part of the problem, it's why understanding the actual result of a sheet is so hard -- the need for the !important statement seems to me a clear indication that something is wrong here. Still, PSS would generate CSS (and only CSS) that would be capable of handling everything CSS could (but possibly restricting the number of ways you could do so). - Finally, "It's a clever idea, it just doesn't seem to be needed." I think sums things up pretty well. As Jeff pointed out, CSS isn't that hard to learn (it just offends my aesthetic sensibilities). Ugliness by itself isn't justification enough for building a new linguistic structure to avoid it. Thanks to all for kicking this around --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
