On 4/25/06, Jeff Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, the issue is simply the generic error message - I'd prefer the > developer gets an error message telling them they are missing x, y, and > z parameters. It sounds like this is much better now in the 0.9/1.0 > line. I've really been holding off on moving up until the new code is > no longer alpha, but it sounds like for all practical purposes it is > something I could safely upgrade to.
You might hold off until we have something labeled "beta" out. That should be soon. Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
