On 4/27/06, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uh, no. Totally wrong. Exactly zero Python representations use > UTF-8 internally. They either use UCS-2 or UCS-4.
I'm absolutely sure that's not correct. Check PEPs 100 and 261... Hmm. Looks like you're absolutely correct. :-) For some reason I was thinking that it was originally UCS-2, but PEP261 added UTF-8 (rather than UCS-4). Thanks for the heads-up. -- Tim Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
